Actually the numbers I listed are measured on the server side - the time to render page by the server. The webpagetest will measure entire round trip between the web browser and the server. Try answers.ros.org or ask.sagemath.org those are faster. Also, you should only hit the complete load time once - to load all the js, which loads at the bottom of the page.
Evgeny ( 2011-12-16 15:43:18 -0500 )edithere comparison between answers.ros.org : http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111216XC2HXWW/1/screenshot/ and stackoverflow: http://www.webpagetest.org/result/111216852HY6Y/1/screenshot/ stack seems to much faster
Tuta ( 2011-12-16 16:48:02 -0500 )editInteresting discussion! :) I don't think speed is very important at the moment, but for the record, webpagetest measures both "first view" and "repeat view", and breaks down the times for different activities/resources -- so it's not just "full load time for uncached view".
piskvorky ( 2011-12-16 21:10:59 -0500 )edit
To answer this we'll need to look at Stackoverflow numbers, we'll try to look up tomorrow.
Evgeny ( 2011-12-15 17:47:06 -0500 )edit