Revision history [back]

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we?

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we?we? - I'm not sure.

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe><iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

edit oh, I see what you mean - would it make more sense to have input validation just reject titles with html tags rather than silently drop them?

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

edit oh, I see what you mean - would it make more sense to have input validation just reject titles with html tags rather than silently drop them?them? We sure can convert tags to entities - but the text would look weird an somebody might think that the site is broken after looking at <b&gt

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

edit oh, I see what you mean - would it make more sense to have input validation just reject titles with html tags rather than silently drop them? We sure can convert tags to entities - but the text would look weird an somebody might think that the site is broken after looking at <b&gt

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

edit oh, I see what you mean - would it make sense to have input validation just reject titles with html tags rather than silently drop them? We sure can convert tags to entities - but the text would look weird an somebody might think that the site is broken after looking at <b&gt

Hmm, tags in in titles - not supported yet. Should we? - I'm not sure.

I know Mathoverflow people like to insert equations into titles - but they do it using a non-html trick, as far as I know.

If we do - it would have to be a limited set of tags - you wouldn' want to have <div> <iframe> <table> and stuff like that.

What tags to you want to allow in title?

edit oh, I see what you mean - would it make sense to have input validation just reject titles with html tags rather than silently drop them? We sure can convert tags to entities - but the text would look weird an somebody might think that the site is broken after looking at <b&gt

edit 2 ok convinced me - it's a bug dammit :)!