Revision history  [back]

Askbot has a few bundled dependencies. From a Linux distribution perspective, we prefer unbundling and packaging them separately to make it reusable across applications. More details hereat

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries/

Going through the dependencies in deps/, I see the following

• grapefruit.py - Seems to just a copy from from https://code.google.com/p/grapefruit/. License: Apache v2. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

• django_authopenid - Forked version from upstream. Intended to be phased out. When and why? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/benoitc/django-authopenid/wiki/Home. Seems inactive. License: Apache v2. Forked copy has no license indication however. Needs to be fixed.

• openid - No README file. Is this forked? What is the upstream? License status unknown. Needs to be fixed.

• livesettings - Forked version of django-livesettings. Status of merge back? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/bkroeze/django-livesettings. License: New BSD. Upstream includes a copy of the license. Bundled fork does not. Needs to be fixed

• recaptcha_django - Seems to be just a copy from https://code.google.com/p/recaptcha-django/. License: New BSD. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

Do let me know your thoughts

Askbot has a few bundled dependencies. From a Linux distribution perspective, we prefer unbundling and packaging them separately to make it reusable across applications. More details at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries/http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

Going through the dependencies in deps/, I see the following

• grapefruit.py - Seems to just a copy from from https://code.google.com/p/grapefruit/. License: Apache v2. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

• django_authopenid - Forked version from upstream. Intended to be phased out. When and why? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/benoitc/django-authopenid/wiki/Home. Seems inactive. License: Apache v2. Forked copy has no license indication however. Needs to be fixed.

• openid - No README file. Is this forked? What is the upstream? License status unknown. Needs to be fixed.

• livesettings - Forked version of django-livesettings. Status of merge back? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/bkroeze/django-livesettings. License: New BSD. Upstream includes a copy of the license. Bundled fork does not. Needs to be fixed

• recaptcha_django - Seems to be just a copy from https://code.google.com/p/recaptcha-django/. License: New BSD. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

Do let me know your thoughts

Askbot has a few bundled dependencies. From a Linux distribution perspective, we prefer unbundling and packaging them separately to make it reusable across applications. More details at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

Going through the dependencies in deps/, I see the following

• grapefruit.py - Seems to just a copy from from https://code.google.com/p/grapefruit/. License: Apache v2. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

• django_authopenid - Forked version from upstream. Intended to be phased out. When and why? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/benoitc/django-authopenid/wiki/Home. Seems inactive. License: Apache v2. Forked copy has no license indication however. Needs to be fixed.

• openid - No README file. Is this forked? What is the upstream? License status unknown. Needs to be fixed.

• livesettings - Forked version of django-livesettings. Status of merge back? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/bkroeze/django-livesettings. License: New BSD. Upstream includes a copy of the license. Bundled fork does not. Needs to be fixed

• recaptcha_django - Seems to be just a copy from https://code.google.com/p/recaptcha-django/. License: New BSD. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

Do let me know your thoughts

Askbot has a few bundled dependencies. From a Linux distribution perspective, we prefer unbundling and packaging them separately to make it reusable across applications. More details at

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

Going through the dependencies in deps/, I see the following

• grapefruit.py - Seems to just a copy from from https://code.google.com/p/grapefruit/. License: Apache v2. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy. License: Apache v2

• django_authopenid - Forked version from upstream. Intended to be phased out. When and why? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/benoitc/django-authopenid/wiki/Home. Seems inactive. License: Apache v2. Forked copy has no license indication however. Needs to be fixed.

• openid - No README file. Is this forked? What is the upstream? License status unknown. Needs to be fixed.

• livesettings - Forked version of django-livesettings. Status of merge back? Upstream at https://bitbucket.org/bkroeze/django-livesettings. License: New BSD. Upstream includes a copy of the license. Bundled fork does not. Needs to be fixed

• recaptcha_django - Seems to be just a copy from https://code.google.com/p/recaptcha-django/. License: New BSD. I intend to package this separately and remove the bundled copy.

Do let me know your thoughts